AnySelected

Liverpool’s own Paddy Pimblett, the surging UFC lightweight contender, isn't holding back his opinions on the way the promotion handles its champions. In a recent interview, Pimblett voiced his frustration and confusion regarding the contrasting treatment of Jon Jones, the undisputed heavyweight champion, compared to Islam Makhachev, who was recently stripped of his lightweight title.

Makhachev’s lightweight belt was taken away due to his prolonged inactivity and refusal to agree to a fight with Charles Oliveira. This decision sent shockwaves through the MMA community, with many questioning the UFC’s handling of champion obligations. Pimblett, echoing these sentiments, believes Jones should be held to the same standard. “I just don’t understand it,” Pimblett stated. “Islam had to vacate his belt, why hasn’t Jon Jones? He hasn’t defended it since 2020.”

Jones’ reign at heavyweight has been marked by inactivity, with only one fight since regaining the title against Ciryl Gane in March 2023. While he remains a dominant force and a significant draw for the UFC, Pimblett’s point highlights a perceived inconsistency in the promotion’s policies.

The debate surrounding champion activity has been a recurring topic in MMA. Fighters and fans alike have argued that champions have a responsibility to defend their titles regularly to maintain the integrity of the division and provide compelling matchups for fans. The UFC has historically struggled to balance the demands of its champions with the need to keep the sport moving forward.

Pimblett’s comments are particularly noteworthy given his own rapid rise in the lightweight division. He’s become a fan favorite with his exciting fighting style and outspoken personality. His call for fairness and consistency within the UFC adds another layer to the ongoing discussion about champion obligations and the promotion’s role in shaping the sport.

The situation raises a crucial question: should all champions be held to the same standards of activity, regardless of their star power or drawing ability? The UFC's response, and Jones' future plans, will be closely watched by fans and fighters alike. Will the promotion address Pimblett's concerns and create a more equitable system for all champions? Only time will tell.

Pimblett’s criticism isn’t necessarily intended as a direct challenge to Jones, but rather as a commentary on the UFC’s overall approach to managing its champions. He wants to see a level playing field where all titleholders are accountable for defending their belts and contributing to the growth of their respective divisions. His perspective offers a valuable insight into the complexities of the sport and the challenges of balancing star power with competitive fairness.

The lightweight division is brimming with talent, and Pimblett is eager to prove himself as a top contender. His focus remains on his own career, but he clearly believes that a more consistent approach to champion management will benefit the entire sport.