AnySelected

James Gunn's highly anticipated 'Superman' has arrived, signaling the dawn of the DC Universe (DCU). While Rachel Brosnahan and David Corenswet deliver a captivating portrayal of Lois Lane and Clark Kent, respectively – arguably the best we've seen on screen – the film itself faces mixed reactions. Is this a bold new direction for DC, or does Gunn overcorrect for the Zack Snyder era, resulting in a Superman movie that's a little *too* lighthearted?

The film aims to establish a new foundation for the DCU, and it largely succeeds in presenting a Superman that feels both familiar and refreshingly new. Corenswet embodies the classic ideals of Superman - unwavering morality, quiet strength, and a genuine desire to help others. However, the film's attempt to differentiate itself from previous iterations, particularly those of Zack Snyder, leads to some questionable choices.

One of the most significant points of contention among viewers is the film's heavy reliance on humor. While a touch of levity can enhance any superhero story, 'Superman' often veers into outright silliness, disrupting the gravity and emotional weight of key moments. The jokes, at times, feel forced and detract from the narrative's potential. This is a clear departure from Snyder's darker, more serious tone, and whether it's a successful move remains to be seen. Some argue it’s a necessary evolution, others find it undermines the character's mythic status.

Despite the narrative inconsistencies, the performances of Rachel Brosnahan and David Corenswet are undeniable highlights. Brosnahan’s Lois Lane is intelligent, resourceful, and fiercely independent – a modern woman who holds her own alongside Superman. Her chemistry with Corenswet is palpable, and they convincingly portray a burgeoning romance built on mutual respect and shared ideals. This Lois isn't just a damsel in distress; she’s an active participant in the story, a vital partner to Superman.

The film’s pacing and narrative structure also draw criticism. The story feels somewhat scattered, jumping between different plot threads without fully developing any of them. While this might be intentional, aiming to set the stage for future DCU installments, it leaves the first film feeling a bit slight. The sense of grand scale and epic scope that one expects from a Superman movie is occasionally lacking.

'Superman' is a complex film, brimming with potential but ultimately falling short of greatness. It’s a bold attempt to reinvent a beloved icon, but the execution is uneven. While the performances of Brosnahan and Corenswet are exceptional, and the film establishes a promising new direction for the DCU, the reliance on humor and the scattered narrative prevent it from reaching its full potential. It's a start, but whether this new DCU can truly soar remains to be seen. Fans will be eager to see how Gunn builds upon this foundation in future installments.