Urban Renewal Bill Faces Setback: PKR MPs Demand Delay, Perikatan Offers Support

2025-08-21
Urban Renewal Bill Faces Setback: PKR MPs Demand Delay, Perikatan Offers Support
Malay Mail

Kuala Lumpur, August 21 – A group of six PKR Members of Parliament (MPs) are calling for a postponement of the second reading of the controversial Urban Renewal Bill until the next Dewan Rakyat sitting. This unexpected move has gained traction, with support emerging from Perikatan Nasional (PN), further complicating the bill’s passage through Parliament.

The core concern raised by the PKR MPs centres around the consent threshold required for urban renewal projects to proceed. They argue that the current threshold, as outlined in the bill, is too low and potentially vulnerable to abuse, jeopardizing the rights and livelihoods of residents in affected areas. Their plea highlights a need for greater safeguards to ensure fair and informed consent from communities before redevelopment can occur.

“We believe that rushing this bill through without addressing these crucial concerns would be a disservice to the people,” stated one of the PKR MPs who requested anonymity. “The current threshold doesn’t adequately protect residents from being forced out of their homes and communities. We need a more robust process that prioritizes their voices and ensures they are fully informed about the implications of urban renewal projects.”

The support from Perikatan Nasional adds another layer of complexity to the situation. While PN has historically held differing views from PKR on many policy matters, their backing on this issue suggests a broader concern regarding the bill's potential impact on vulnerable communities. Analysts suggest that PN’s involvement could be a strategic move to highlight perceived shortcomings in the government’s approach to urban development.

The Urban Renewal Bill aims to streamline the process of redeveloping dilapidated or underutilized urban areas. Proponents argue that it’s necessary to modernize cities, attract investment, and improve the quality of life for residents. However, critics contend that the bill grants excessive powers to developers and could lead to displacement of low-income communities and the destruction of heritage sites.

This delay request comes at a critical juncture. The government is under pressure to deliver on its promises of economic growth and urban revitalization. However, the concerns raised by PKR and supported by PN underscore the importance of balancing development goals with the protection of residents’ rights and the preservation of community identity.

The Dewan Rakyat’s decision on whether to postpone the second reading of the bill will be closely watched by stakeholders across the country. It will likely set a precedent for future urban development policies and could significantly impact the lives of many Malaysians.

Key implications of the potential delay:

  • Scrutiny of Consent Threshold: A deeper examination of the consent requirements will be undertaken.
  • Community Consultation Emphasis: Greater focus on meaningful engagement with affected communities.
  • Potential Amendments: The bill may be revised to address the concerns raised by PKR and PN.

The coming weeks will be crucial in determining the fate of the Urban Renewal Bill and its impact on Malaysia's urban landscape.

Recommendations
Recommendations