AGC Stands Firm: Dismisses Judicial Crisis Claims, Reaffirms Appointment Process Integrity
PETALING JAYA: The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has firmly refuted recent calls for a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) and a parliamentary select committee to probe alleged irregularities in the judicial appointment process. In a statement released today, the AGC underscored the robustness and transparency of the existing system, dismissing the notion of a judicial crisis.
The calls for an RCI and parliamentary investigation stemmed from concerns raised regarding the appointment of judges, with critics alleging a lack of transparency and potential bias. However, the AGC maintains that the current process, involving consultations and careful consideration, ensures the appointment of qualified and impartial individuals to the judiciary.
“The AGC has consistently adhered to the established procedures and guidelines for judicial appointments,” the statement read. “These procedures are designed to safeguard the integrity and independence of the judiciary, and we are confident that they have been followed diligently in all recent appointments.”
The AGC emphasized that the appointment of judges is a complex process involving multiple stakeholders, including the Chief Justice, the Prime Minister, and the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. The process incorporates thorough vetting, interviews, and evaluations to ensure that only the most suitable candidates are selected.
Furthermore, the AGC highlighted the importance of respecting the independence of the judiciary. “Public speculation and scrutiny of the appointment process, while understandable, should not undermine the confidence in the judiciary’s ability to deliver impartial justice,” the statement added.
Addressing Specific Concerns: The AGC acknowledged that there may be perceptions of a lack of transparency, but insisted that this is not due to a deliberate attempt to conceal information. Instead, it attributed the situation to the confidential nature of the process, which is necessary to protect the privacy and reputation of candidates.
“While we understand the desire for greater transparency, certain aspects of the appointment process must remain confidential to ensure fairness and impartiality,” the AGC explained. “We are committed to continuously reviewing and improving the process, but we will not compromise on the principles of confidentiality and independence.”
Maintaining Judicial Integrity: The AGC reiterated its commitment to upholding the integrity and independence of the judiciary. It urged all parties to refrain from making unsubstantiated claims that could damage the reputation of the courts and undermine public trust in the justice system.
The AGC’s response comes at a time when the judiciary is facing increasing scrutiny. The recent calls for an RCI and parliamentary investigation highlight the need for ongoing dialogue and collaboration between all stakeholders to ensure the continued strength and impartiality of the Malaysian judiciary. The AGC’s firm stance signals its determination to defend the integrity of the appointment process and maintain public confidence in the judicial system.
Looking Ahead: The AGC concluded by stating that it remains open to constructive feedback and suggestions for improving the judicial appointment process. It emphasized the importance of a collaborative approach to ensure that the judiciary remains a cornerstone of the Malaysian legal system.