Former Sabah & Sarawak Chief Judge Stands Firm: Claims of Pressure on the Bench Remain
PUTRAJAYA, July 28 – Just days after retiring as the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak, Tan Sri Abdul Rahman Sebli has resolutely defended his controversial farewell statement alleging undue pressure on the judiciary. His strong stance continues to reverberate through the legal community, sparking debate and calls for a thorough investigation.
Sebli’s bombshell claim, delivered during a farewell ceremony, asserted that he faced pressure from a senior judge regarding judicial decisions. The remarks, unprecedented in their directness, immediately sent shockwaves across Malaysia, raising serious questions about the independence of the judiciary, a cornerstone of the nation's legal system.
Speaking today, Sebli reiterated his position, stating firmly, “I stick to my speech. I said what I said, and I stand by it.” He declined to provide specifics regarding the nature of the pressure or the identity of the senior judge involved, citing ongoing legal considerations and a desire to avoid prejudicing any potential investigations. However, his unwavering commitment to his original statement signals a determination to bring the matter to light and ensure accountability.
The allegations have prompted swift responses from various quarters. The Malaysian Bar Council, the nation’s leading association of lawyers, has called for an independent inquiry into Sebli’s claims. They emphasized the critical importance of judicial independence and the need to safeguard the integrity of the courts. “The Bar Council takes these allegations very seriously,” said a spokesperson. “A thorough and impartial investigation is essential to maintain public confidence in the judiciary.”
Government officials have also acknowledged the seriousness of the matter. While stopping short of commenting directly on Sebli’s specific claims, they have affirmed their commitment to upholding the independence of the judiciary and ensuring a fair and transparent legal system. There is growing speculation that the government may initiate a formal investigation to address the concerns raised.
Sebli's retirement marks the end of a distinguished legal career. He served as Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak for several years, overseeing a vast jurisdiction and dealing with a wide range of complex legal issues. His decision to speak out so candidly upon his departure has undoubtedly left a lasting impact on the Malaysian legal landscape. Whether his claims will lead to concrete action remains to be seen, but his courage in speaking truth to power has ignited a crucial conversation about the state of the judiciary in Malaysia.
The situation continues to unfold, with observers closely watching for any developments. The public, legal professionals, and government officials alike are keenly aware of the implications of Sebli’s allegations and the potential impact on the rule of law in Malaysia. The call for transparency and accountability is growing louder, and the hope is that a fair and impartial investigation will shed light on the truth and ensure that the judiciary remains a bastion of integrity and independence.